AJ Barner
Tight ends · SEA · Michigan
Age 24 (May 3, 2002) Exp 3rd season

AJ Barner

HOLD Rank TE24 · #146 overall Conf medium ADP UD Proj 74/101/131 Risk medium
AvoidFadeHoldTargetMust
inline-yred-zonetd-regressionte2-threatpunt-tieryear-3champs-offense
Quick hits
Seattle Seahawks — team context full profile ›
Play-caller
Fleury has never called plays, so per methodology §9 every tendency is a low-confidence system prior, not a Fleury track record — but the continuity claim is unusually strong and explicit: Fleury's…
Tendency
50% pass · run-heavy (30/32)
~29 pass / ~28 rush att/g · 10.5 win total (positive)
O-line (2025)
Pass 12 Run 8
rank of 32 · ESPN win rates
QB
Drew Lock
Jalen Milroe
RB '25 car
George Holani 4%
Kenny McIntosh
WR '25 tgt
Jake Bobo 0%
Emmanuel Henderson Jr.
TE '25 tgt
AJ Barner 15%
Elijah Arroyo 6%
Eric Saubert 2%
Harrison Bryant 1% HOU
Schedule & strength of schedule · TE SOS: 16th-easiest slate
W1 NE 18
W2 @ARI 31
W3 @WAS 28
W4 LAC 5
W5 SF 24
W6 @DEN 17
W7 KC 7
W8 CHI 14
W9 ARI 31
W10 @LV 3
W11BYE
W12 @SF 24
W13 DAL 11
W14 NYG 9
W15 @PHI 2
W16 LAR 16
W17 @CAR 20
W18 @LAR 16
Number = that defense's 2025 rank vs TEs in half-PPR points allowed — 1 = toughest, 32 = softest. Preseason proxy from last season. = dome / retractable roof (weather-neutral). Depth: CBS Sports depth charts, fetched 2026-07-13 (DEN WR via ESPN).
Your take

Sign in with Google to rate and tag this player — private to you.

AJ Barner (TE, SEA) — 2026 evaluation

Verdict

HOLD (medium confidence) at an undrafted price. Barner is the defending champs' locked-in TE1 coming off a TE14-overall season (147.3 PPR, 17 g — receiving.csv 2025), and the market prices him outside the top 22 TEs — but the price is roughly right. His 2025 finish was built on a 8.8% TD-per-target rate (1.5× the 5.8% league TE rate, both computed from receiving.csv 2025) atop a modest 0.15 TPRR earning rate, in a bottom-quartile pass-volume offense, with 2025 R2 pick Elijah Arroyo being publicly groomed for a bigger year-2 role (seahawks.com OTA coverage, May–June 2026). Regress the TDs, tax a few routes for Arroyo, and the median lands ~7.2 PPG — below the ~11-PPG streamer baseline. Profile (fringe TE2 / TD-dart), tier (punt), and price (free) agree, so no "market is wrong" thesis clears the bar: he's a fine final-pick dart or best-ball TD play, not a mispricing.

Bull case

  • The RZ/goal-line role is real, not TD noise alone: 18.6% red-zone target share plus a designed short-yardage rushing package (10-14-1, nine first downs) on an elite scoring offense — TD access is a first-class TE input (te.md §1), and his is top-12 caliber.
  • The job is banked: 82.5% pass-snap participation, all 20 starts on the SB champs, depth-chart TE1 everywhere, a TE-coach OC who inherited him, and public "one of the best TEs in the league" confidence (NFL.com, June 2026). Floor of a startable bye-week TE at a price of zero.
  • Residual upside levers: Kupp is 33 and declining (15.4% TS in 2025); if his MOF share leaks to the TE layer, or Arroyo's development stalls again, Barner's late-2025 usage (88%+ pass snaps, 4.5 tgt/g weeks 11–18) becomes the season-long base — that's the ~158 ceiling, low-end TE1.

Bear case

  • TD regression is near-certain: 8.8% TD/target vs. the 5.8% league TE rate; strip the spike and his 2025 was a ~125-point, TE18-ish season — which is what 2026 projects to be. The market already learned this lesson; he had a 9-game TD drought inside the very season being cited.
  • Arroyo is a routes tax with draft capital and organizational sponsorship: R2 pick, "rare athletic traits," explicit team statements about a bigger year-2 role, strong OTAs — every route Arroyo wins comes out of the only resource that matters, and Fleury's "and/or" framing invites a weekly committee. Two TEs from one team are almost never both rosterable (te.md §6).
  • Earning rate says outlet, not hub: two seasons of ~0.15 TPRR, 1.1 YPRR, 4.8 aDOT, 8% air-yards share, weak athletic profile — on 29 att/g, that math cannot produce a top-10 TE season without TD luck, and he's coming off two surgeries after playing hurt for half of 2025.

Projection & comps

Bottom-up (PPR assumed), 17-game basis. Team volume from data/team-profiles/SEA.md (built 2026-07-07): ~61 plays/g, ~53% pass, ~29 att/g → ~550 team dropbacks (matches 2025 actual: 550 REG dropbacks, participation.csv computed 2026-07-07).

ScenarioRoutes/RPTargetsLinePPRPPG
Floor (20th)RP slips to ~70% as Arroyo eats routes; 1–2 games missed post-surgery~5038-350-393~5.8
Median (50th)RP ~78%, TPRR ~0.15, TDs anchored to xTD (~4.5 rec + 0.5 rush)~6045-440-4.5 (+ tush-push work)123~7.2
Ceiling (80th)Arroyo stalls, Kupp declines, Fleury TE lean; RZ role holds TD rate up~7054-540-7 (+1 rush TD)158~9.3

Usage profile (te.md §2 table)

RP figures below are a pass-snap participation proxy (share of team dropbacks on the field, participation.csv join computed 2026-07-07) — an upper bound on true route participation since it includes pass-block/chip snaps; true RP is likely a few points lower. Route-denominated rates inherit the caveat.

Metric2025 (REG)2024 (REG)BandRead
Route participation (proxy)82.5% (454/550 dropbacks)36.1% (259/718)Elite-adjacentGate passes. Massive year-1→2 jump (Noah Fant's 2025 release opened the job). Weeks 15–18 with Arroyo on IR: 88.2% (127/144)
TPRR (proxy)0.150 (68/454)0.147 (38/259)Concern-to-lowThe problem. Two straight years below the 0.18 "good" line — RP ≥80% + TPRR ~0.15 leans toward the "decoy running routes" sell quadrant per §2
YPRR (proxy)1.14 (519/454)0.95LowVolume-Y, not a difference-maker
Target share15.0% (68 tgt; receiving.csv)6.7%Below "good" (16%)Third claim behind JSN (35.8%) and Kupp (15.4%)
Red-zone target share18.6% (11 of 59 RZ att — RotoWire via web, 2026)UNVERIFIEDGood (18–25%)The trait that pays. Plus a designed tush-push/short-yardage rushing role: 10-14-1, 9 rushing first downs (rushing.csv; SI red-zone report)
End-zone targetsUNVERIFIEDUNVERIFIEDNo local or free source; xTD anchored to RZ share instead
Detached rate (slot/wide)UNVERIFIED — profile reads inline-Y: 4.76 aDOT (NGS 2025), under-center/short-yardage usageUNVERIFIEDPresumed lowNo alignment export locally; camp reports of him "moved around" would be an upgrade signal
Pass-block rateUNVERIFIEDUNVERIFIEDHigh-blocking role implied by scheme (28% 12-pers., FB on roster)
xFPNo provider xFP on hand (UNVERIFIED); internal read: 147.3 actual PPR ran ~15–20 pts ahead of usage-based expectation on TD rate aloneTE12–15 usageActual TE14; usage says lower

Supporting efficiency: 76.5% catch rate, +0.78 YAC over expected (NGS 2025) — reliable hands, some run-after-catch juice; PFF graded him 74.4 overall / 76.9 receiving, 11th/10th of 37 TEs (PFF via web search, 2026). The efficiency is fine; the earning rate and air-yard share (8.1% — receiving.csv) are what's thin.

Context (data/team-profiles/SEA.md, built 2026-07-07)

Scarcity picture (te.md §7)

Punt tier — and below the baseline. 2025 TE12 PPG ≈ 10.5 (weekly/receiving.csv, min 8 g); streamer baseline ≈ 11.0–11.5 PPG. Barner's median 7.2 PPG is a negative ~4 PPG edge — he is not a "draft and start" punt pick, he's a bench dart whose path to relevance is TD retention plus an Arroyo stall. In a 12-team, 1-TE, no-premium league that makes him final-round/waiver material, which is exactly where the market has him. TE-premium (+0.5) or 2-TE/deeper formats move him up a band; the verdict here is format-specific.

Market's case, stated fairly: the market sees a TD-dependent, 8.7-PPG, low-aDOT blocking-adjacent TE whose TE2 is a hyped second-round athlete, on a bottom-quartile pass-volume team — and would rather spend late picks on higher-ceiling profiles (Gadsden 160.5, Sadiq 168.1 — adp_ffc_2026-07-07.csv). That case is mostly sound; the market slightly underrates how secure the job and RZ role are, but not by enough to create draft-day edge in this format.

Tripwires (void this eval; re-run)

Sources
  • data/stats/2025/receiving.csv, rushing.csv, weekly.csv, snap_counts.csv, injuries.csv, ngs_receiving.csv, participation.csv + data/stats/2024/ equivalents (nflverse via nflreadpy, pulled 2026-07-07). Dropback/RP/TPRR proxies computed from participation.csv 2026-07-07 (REG only; dropback = charted time-to-throw/route/pass-rushers).
  • data/team-profiles/SEA.md (built + verified 2026-07-07): Fleury, volume, PA/12-pers., hierarchy, OL, win total.
  • data/adp/adp_ffc_2026-07-07.csv: no Barner ADP (outside 15-round FFC mock range); TE landscape (McBride 27.6 … Sadiq 168.1). data/raw/sleeper/players_2026-07-07.json: age 24, Michigan, years_exp 2, TE1 depth order, Questionable.
  • Web (all fetched/searched 2026-07-07): seahawks.com — two offseason surgeries / camp-ready / no on-field OTA work (June 2026), Arroyo year-2 role + OTA praise (May–June 2026), Barner R4 No. 121 draft pages; NBC Sports PFT (June 2026); NFL.com — "one of the best tight ends" (June 2026); CBS Sports — Fleury outlook, 22.4% TE room share, 43% 2+ TE, "and/or" quote (2026); RotoWire/FFCalculator — 11 RZ targets, 18.6% of 59 RZ att (2026); Field Gulls — Arroyo wk-14 knee, IR (Dec 2025); PlayerProfiler — 4.91 forty, 88.2 speed score, 11.4% dominator (fetched 2026-07-07); PFF via search — 74.4/76.9 grades (2026); SI — tush-push RZ report (Nov 2025).
  • UNVERIFIED: end-zone target count; detached (slot/wide) rate; pass-block snap rate; provider xFP; 2024 RZ target share. PFR blocked (403).