Jacksonville Jaguars DST
Defenses · JAX

Jacksonville Jaguars DST

FADE Rank DST12 · #106 overall Conf medium ADP 129.9 Proj 92/120/147 Risk medium
AvoidFadeHoldTargetMust
takeaway-regressionreturn-td-miragemid-prwrblitz-manufactured-pressurelost-int-engineweek1-premiumschedule-cliff-wk2-5dc-continuity
Quick hits
Your take

Sign in with Google to rate and tag this player — private to you.

Jacksonville Jaguars DST — 2026 evaluation

Verdict

FADE (medium confidence) at ADP 129.9 (FFC PPR mocks, 2026-07-07) — DST7 by ADP, a round-11 pick in a 12-team league, costing a startable skill player: Dallas Goedert (128.9), Jonathon Brooks (129.6), Jauan Jennings (130.7), Jordan Mason (126.7), Mark Andrews (130.0). The market's case, stated fairly: JAX finished DST3 in 2025 (144 pts, 8.5 PPG — FantasyPros), set franchise records in takeaways (31), INTs (22), and passes defensed (107), fielded the NFL's best run defense (85.6 ypg), allowed the 8th-fewest points (19.76/gm), returns its DC (Campanile, year 2) and its entire edge room (Hines-Allen, Walker, Gardeck), plays in front of a top-third offense, and opens at home against a 6.5-win-total Cleveland team — and at DST7 the market has already discounted the unit four spots off its finish. Why the market is still wrong: it is paying a round-11 price for outputs, not inputs. The 2025 finish was spike-built — 31 takeaways from a defense that produced 9 the year before with the same edge core, plus 4 defensive/return TDs — sitting on a mid rush (PRWR 38%, 14th; 4.53% sack rate, concern band; pressure manufactured by a 27.7% blitz rate), and the two biggest INT engines (Devin Lloyd, team-high 5 INT, to CAR; CB Greg Newsome to NYG) walked. Regressed per dst.md §1/§4, the median (~120) is a DST9–13 unit whose *drafted* value is one premium week (CLE) followed by a weeks-2–5 stream-away stretch — and a comparable week-1 spot (DET home vs NO, ADP 139.1) exists a round later, with the JAX-shaped stream weeks covered free off waivers. FADE is price, not risk: at ~142+ (round 12+, DST9-or-later territory) this flips to TARGET as arguably the best week-1 card in football at dart cost.

Bull case

  • The sack column points up, not down: two straight years of sub-21% pressure-to-sack conversion (19.0% in 2025) on good-band pressure (23.8%) is the 2×2 buy cell — ~35–40 sacks without anything improving — and the full edge room returns under the same DC in year 2, the exact continuity profile dst.md §3 rewards in the weeks 1–4 window.
  • Week 1 is arguably the best drafted-week matchup in football: home vs a 6.5-win-total Browns team whose entire QB depth chart is sack-prone or turnover-prone (Sanders 9.8% sack / 4.7% INT rate in 2025; Gabriel 9.3% sack; Flacco 3.8% INT) — a premium floor-and-ceiling spot in the one week every drafted DST must start.
  • The ball-production machine wasn't pure luck: Campanile's disguise-heavy hybrid produced 107 passes defensed and 22 INTs, the regressed projection (~24 takeaways) is still comfortably above the ~22 league mean — and Travis Hunter taking a bigger CB role (GM-signaled, June 2026) adds a first-pick-caliber ball-skills talent the 2025 unit never had. In a turnover-weighted league table, this profile re-rates immediately.

Bear case

  • You're buying the two noisiest columns at their all-time franchise tick: 31 takeaways and 4 defensive/return TDs from a core that managed 9 takeaways the season before — regression here isn't a prior, it's this team's own recent history — sitting on a rush that ranked 14th in PRWR and 4.53% in sack rate (concern band), with the pressure manufactured by a near-doubled blitz rate rather than a dominant front.
  • The takeaway engine was poached in March: Lloyd (team-high 5 INT, the pick-six), Newsome, and Wingard are gone, and the replacement thesis is a two-way rookie coming off knee surgery whose snap split is explicitly unsettled — the INT column loses its top producers in exactly the season it was already due to fall.
  • The pick buys one startable week: after the CLE opener, weeks 2–5 run @DEN (9.5 WT, Nix 3.5% sack rate), NE (10.5 WT), @CIN (9.5 WT, healthy Burrow), PHI-in-London (10.5 WT) — a stretch where free waiver units (TB vs CLE wk 2, CHI vs NYJ wk 4, NYJ vs CLE wk 5) profile better, while the round-11 cost was Goedert, Brooks, or Jennings — startable skill players every week.

Projection & comps

Bottom-up, standard DST scoring (assumed table above), 17 games:

ComponentFloor (p20)MedianCeiling (p80)Basis
Opp. dropbacks~680~700~7152025: ~706 (32 sacks ÷ 4.53% — def_summary, pulled 2026-07-07); win total drifted 9.5 → 8.5 (BetMGM 2026-05-20 → DraftKings June 2026), fewer lead-driven opponent dropbacks than 13-4 produced
Sack rate → sacks4.4% → 305.0% → 355.7% → 41Pressure 23.8% (good band, team-profile method) held on full edge continuity; conversion 19.0% (4.53 ÷ 23.8) regressed up toward the ~21% mean — the 2×2 buy cell (good pressure, low sacks) claws back ~3 sacks, but the rush talent base (PRWR 38%, 14th) caps the ceiling
Takeaways → pts19 → 3824 → 4829 → 582025: 31 (1.82/gm) regressed ~50% toward 1.3/gm ≈ 1.56/gm, then trimmed for Lloyd (5 INT) + Newsome departures → ~1.4/gm ≈ 24 (≈15 INT/9 FR). The in-house noise proof: same core produced 9 takeaways in 2024 (def_summary). Never project a 28+ season to repeat (dst.md §1)
Def/return TDs → pts1 → 62 → 123 → 18Base rate 1.5–2.5 per dst.md §1. 2025 actual: 4 (Lloyd 99-yd + A. Johnson 59-yd pick-sixes, 2 P. Washington punt-return TDs — jaguars.com season review, Jan 2026) — a −12 pt haircut the market at DST7 hasn't fully applied
PA/gm → bracket pts~22 → 17~20.5–21 → 23~19.5 → 282025: 19.76 (8th) rode a +13 TO differential and a 6th-in-PROE offense; TO-luck reversal pushes brackets down a band even with the same personnel. Own offense stays good (Lawrence yr 2 under Coen) — holds the floor
Safeties01 → 21 → 2League base rate
Season total~92 (5.4/gm)~120 (7.1/gm)~147 (8.6/gm)Floor ≈ DST20+; median ≈ DST9–13 (2025 scale: DST10 = 127, DST12 = 118 — FantasyPros); ceiling ≈ a 2025 repeat (DST3 = 144) requiring the takeaway/TD spike to hold twice

Sanity check on the build: 2025 actuals reconstruct as 32 sacks + 62 takeaway pts + 24 TD pts + ~25 bracket pts ≈ 144 actual (FantasyPros) — the model reproduces last season, then the regression does the rest.

Games/startability risk: medium. Driver: not injury — the schedule cliff (weeks 2, 4, 5 are likely stream-away spots, so the round-11 pick rides the bench in the window it was bought for) plus dependence on takeaway variance for its weekly ceiling. Edge-room continuity (Hines-Allen + Walker + Gardeck, DC year 2) keeps it off high; a duo injury flips it there (tripwire #4).

Comps (profile: takeaway/return-TD-spike DST3 finish on a mid pressure base, repriced the next summer):

Signal core (dst.md §2)

Metric20242025Band / read
Pressure rate27.9% charted-dropback method (nflverse participation, computed 2026-07-07); 30th on ESPN pressure-% basis (Black and Teal citing ESPN, ~July 2025)23.8% all-opp-dropback method (team profile, computed 2026-07-07); 28.9% charted-dropback method — same-method trend flat yr/yrGood, not elite (23–26 band). Basis discrepancy flagged: charting-based runs hot vs ESPN. Signal: stable, mid-to-good, one year old
Sack rate5.14% (34 sacks — def_summary 2024)4.53% (32 sacks — def_summary)Concern (<5.5%) both years — the duo eats (18.5 combined) but nobody else does (next-most: Maason Smith 3.0 — Black and Teal, 2025)
PRWR (ESPN)Dead last (Black and Teal citing ESPN, ~July 2025)38%, rank 14 (ESPN win rates, 2026-01-06)Mid — at the <38% concern boundary. One year of mid-pack rush talent, not a two-year base; the 2025 jump is Campanile scheme + health, not proven talent
Pressure→sack conversion~18.4% (5.14 ÷ 27.9, charted basis)~19.0% (4.53 ÷ 23.8, profile basis)Below the ~21% mean two straight years → regress up — the one column that points in JAX's favor (~+3 sacks)
Takeaways/gm0.53 (9: 6 INT/3 FR — def_summary)1.82 (31: 22 INT/9 FR — def_summary; franchise record)The 2×2 trap cell: elite takeaways on a mid rush (dst.md §9 red flag). 0.53 → 1.82 in one year with the same edges *is* the regression argument
Blitz rate16.3% (charted method, pre-Campanile)27.7% (charted; team profile: 27.9%)Below the 32% boom/bust line, but the near-doubling shows the pressure is scheme-manufactured — Flores-style sim pressures, not a dominant 4-man rush
Man/zone59.2% / 40.8% (prior staff)25.8% / 74.2% (zone-leaning)Matchup input for /weekly-edge; full scheme flip under Campanile — 2024 coverage stats void
Opp. implied PPG, wks 1–4~17 est. (CLE, 6.5 WT) / ~24 est. (@DEN, 9.5 WT) / ~23 est. (NE, 10.5 WT) / ~24 est. (@CIN, 9.5 WT) — no posted game lines yet; estimates from DraftKings win totals, June 2026 (UNVERIFIED as lines)One elite week, then concern band — weeks 2–5 opponents all carry win totals ≥9.5
EPA/play allowed+0.127 (bottom-tier — def_summary)−0.080 (top-8 range — def_summary)Real one-year improvement; how much is scheme vs TO luck is the open question the price answers wrong
PA/gm25.5919.76 (8th)Improved — but ridden on +13 TO diff and a top-6-PROE offense; treat as output, not input (dst.md §1)
Base-rate xFPrebuilt ≈ 120 std pts ≈ DST9–13Priced DST7 — the two-to-five-spot gap, at a round-11 cost, is the verdict

2×2 read (dst.md §2): low sacks on good pressure = buy the sack column (mildly — worth ~3 sacks of positive regression). But the *finish* wasn't built on sacks; it was built on the takeaway/TD columns, which sit in the classic sell cell: elite takeaways + 4 non-offensive TDs on a 14th-PRWR rush. The +3 sacks claw back roughly a quarter of the ~26 points the takeaway/TD regression removes.

Context (team profile: data/team-profiles/JAX.md, built 2026-07-07)

Early-season streaming picture (weeks 1–6) — handoff for /weekly-edge

Schedule: jaguars.com 2026 schedule release / ESPN (May 2026, verified 2026-07-07). No game lines posted yet for weeks 1–6 (checked 2026-07-07); implied totals are win-total-based estimates, UNVERIFIED as lines. QB rates from data/stats/2025/passing.csv (sack rate = sacks ÷ (att + sacks)).

WkOppVenueOpp win total (DK, June 2026)Opp QB (2025 sack / INT rate)Read
1vs CLEHome6.5 (+105/−120)Unsettled: Sanders (9.8% / 4.7%), Gabriel (9.3% / 1.1%), Watson, Flacco (5.3% / 3.8% w/ CLE) — Kalshi: Watson 59% / Sanders 36%; Polymarket recently flashed Flacco (fetched 2026-07-07)Premium — the week the pick buys. Every candidate QB is sack- or turnover-prone; est. implied ≤18
2@ DENRoad9.5 (−115/−105)Bo Nix (3.5% / 1.8%)Stream away — road, altitude, low-sack QB
3vs NEHome10.5 (+125/−150)Drake Maye (8.7% / 1.6%, 47 sacks taken)Coin flip — implied total fails the ≤20 anchor, but real home sack equity
4@ CINRoad9.5 (−140/+115)Burrow (6.2% / 1.9%, healthy)Stream away — road vs a top-10 implied total
5vs PHILondon (Tottenham; JAX home designation UNVERIFIED)10.5 (+105/−125)Hurts (6.6% / 1.3%)Stream away — neutralized venue, elite offense
6vs HOULondon (Wembley; JAX home designation UNVERIFIED)9.5 (−125/+105)Stroud (5.2% / 1.9%)Coin flip — neutral site, mid matchup

Likely-available pivots (FFC 2026-07-07; CLE early schedule via ESPN, fetched 2026-07-07): DET (139.1) opens home vs NO — a comparable week-1 premium a round cheaper (per denver-broncos-dst.md card). TB (undrafted, outside the top-15 DST ADPs) hosts CLE in week 2 — a free direct replacement for JAX's @DEN week. CHI (166.0) gets home NYJ in week 4 (18.5 implied per chicago-bears-dst.md) — covers the @CIN week. NYJ (undrafted) hosts CLE in week 5; PIT (148.4) visits CLE in week 4. The pattern: everything JAX's early card lacks after week 1 is available for nothing — which is most of the FADE.

Tripwires (re-run this eval if any fire)

Sources
  • data/stats/2025/def_summary.csv, data/stats/2024/def_summary.csv — nflverse via nflreadpy, pulled 2026-07-07 (2025: 32 sacks/4.53%, 22 INT/9 FR = 31 TO, PA 19.76, EPA −0.080; 2024: 34 sacks/5.14%, 6 INT/3 FR = 9 TO, PA 25.59, EPA +0.127)
  • data/stats/2025/participation.csv, data/stats/2024/participation.csv — nflverse, pulled 2026-07-07 (charted-dropback method computed 2026-07-07: pressure 27.9% → 28.9%, blitz 16.3% → 27.7%, man 59.2% → 25.8%; team-profile all-dropback method 2025: pressure 23.8%, blitz 27.9%, man 25.4%)
  • data/stats/2025/passing.csv — nflverse, pulled 2026-07-07 (opponent QB sack/INT rates: Sanders, Gabriel, Flacco, Nix, Maye, Burrow, Hurts, Stroud)
  • data/adp/adp_ffc_2026-07-07.csv — FFC PPR mocks, 2026-07-07 (JAX DST 129.9 = DST7; skill range: Mason 126.7, Goedert 128.9, Brooks 129.6, Andrews 130.0, Jennings 130.7; pivots MIN 135.4, DET 139.1, PIT 148.4, CHI 166.0)
  • data/team-profiles/JAX.md — built 2026-07-07 (Campanile yr 2, scheme rates, edge/CB personnel moves, own-offense quality, win total 9.5 BetMGM 2026-05-20)
  • ESPN 2025 win-rate rankings, 2026-01-06 (fetched 2026-07-07): JAX PRWR 38% (14th), RSWR 28% (31st), PBWR 68% (9th)
  • jaguars.com "10 Statistics That Shaped Jaguars' 2025 Season" (Jan 2026, via search 2026-07-07): 2 defensive TDs (Lloyd 99-yd, A. Johnson 59-yd), 2 P. Washington punt-return TDs, franchise-record takeaways
  • Black and Teal (via search 2026-07-07): 2024 ESPN basis — dead-last PRWR, 30th pressure % (~July 2025 article); duo 18.5 combined sacks, next-most Maason Smith 3.0; BR top-5 pass-rush duo ranking
  • RotoWire NFL win totals — DraftKings, June 2026 (fetched 2026-07-07): CLE 6.5, DEN 9.5, NE 10.5, CIN 9.5, PHI 10.5, HOU 9.5, JAX 8.5 (drift down from BetMGM 9.5, 2026-05-20)
  • jaguars.com / ESPN 2026 schedule release (May 2026, via search 2026-07-07): wks 1–6 = vs CLE, @DEN, vs NE, @CIN, PHI (Tottenham), HOU (Wembley); ESPN CLE schedule (fetched 2026-07-07): CLE @TB wk 2, @NYJ wk 5, @TEN wk 7
  • CLE QB market (via search 2026-07-07): Kalshi Watson 59% / Sanders 36%; Polymarket recently Flacco; Grossi odds via Browns Nation — unsettled room
  • CBS Sports (June 2026, via team profile/search): Hunter LCL recovery on track, GM-signaled CB emphasis 2026
  • FantasyPros 2025 NFL DST statistics (fetched 2026-07-07): JAX DST3, 144.0 pts (8.5 PPG); SEA DST1 179, HOU DST2 164, DEN DST4 143, LAR DST5 136, DST12 NO 118
  • evaluations/players/2026/denver-broncos-dst.md, chicago-bears-dst.md (2026-07-07): assumed-table inflation test (DST1−DST12 = 61 pts), DET wk-1 vs NO and CHI wk-4 vs NYJ (18.5 implied) pivot cards